Cardillo Travel Systems, Inc.

Write a filthy to five (4-5) page brochure in which you:1. Explain the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rationale to enjoin Cardillo executives with each of the subjoined reversals:making faithless representations to beyond auditorsweak to sustain obsequious financial historyweak to rasp unhesitating financial reports with the SECviolating the insider trading stipulations of the federal securities laws2. Determine who was in reversal or ductility of the AICPA’s Code of Authoritative Conduct in this event examine and stir the guide reasons why they were or were referable attributable attributable attributable in ductility. Provide maintenance ce the rationale.3. Stir the actions smitten by Cardillo’s beyond auditors and evaluate the roll of earningness of the audit facilitate government in this event examine. Provide maintenance ce the rationale.4. Determine whether or referable attributable attributable attributable the five (5) components of inside moderate were substance ensueed. Maintenance the confutation with at smallest brace (2) examples.5. Create an dispute ce or athwart whether auditors accept a calling to assess the condemnation of the resolutions made by Cardillo’s government. Maintenance the dispute.6. Authentication at smallest brace (2) condition academic media in this enactment. Referable attributable attributablee: Wikipedia and resembling idea Websites do referable attributable attributable attributable adapt as academic media.Your enactment must ensue these cematting requirements:Be idead, inclose spaced, using Times New Roman font (extent 12), with one-inch margins on full sides; citations and intimations must ensue APA or school-restricted cemat. Check with your adherent ce any joined instructions.Include a shelter page containing the heading of the enactment, the student’s indicate, the adherent’s indicate, the line heading, and the determination. The shelter page and the intimation page are referable attributable attributable attributable intervening in the required enactment page extension.The restricted line attainments outcomes associated with this enactment are:Stir the system and regulatory requirements ce authoritative incorporeal resolution making.Stir the dubious factors of profession, audit, and planning facilitates, and the system of managing these facilitates in audit engagements.Stir an audit framework and impost system ce evaluating the virtue of inside moderates akin to financial reporting.Authentication technology and advice media to elaboration issues in auditing.Write perspicuously and concisely environing auditing using befitting adaptation mechanics.Grading ce this enactment earn be inveterate on exculpation condition, logic / construction of the brochure, and articulation and adaptation skills, using the subjoined rubric found here.Rubric ce enactment 2 Acc.html
rubric_for_assignment_2_acc.html

rubric_for_assignment_2_acc.html

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Cardillo Travel Systems, Inc.
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

rubric_for_assignment_2_acc.html

rubric_for_assignment_2_acc.html

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Grading ce this enactment earn be inveterate on exculpation condition, logic / construction of the brochure, and articulation and adaptation skills, using the
subjoined rubric.
Points: 280
Unacceptable
Enactment 2: Cardillo Travel Systems, Inc.
Fair
Proficient
Exemplary
Criteria
1a. Explain the
Securities and
Exchange
Commission?s rationale
to enjoin the Cardillo
executives? reversal of
making faithless
representations to
beyond auditors.
Weight: 5%
1b. Explain the
Securities and
Exchange
Commission?s rationale
to enjoin the Cardillo
executives? reversal of
weak to sustain
obsequious financial
records.
Weight: 5%
1c. Explain the
Securities and
Exchange
Commission?s rationale
to enjoin the Cardillo
executives? reversal of
weak to rasp unhesitating
financial reports with the
SEC.
Weight: 5%
1d. Explain the
Securities and
Exchange
Commission?s rationale
to enjoin the Cardillo
executives? reversal of
violating the insider
trading stipulations of the
federal securities laws.
Weight: 5%
2. Determine who was
in reversal or
ductility of the
AICPA?s Code of
Authoritative Conduct in
this event examine and
stir the guide reasons
why they were or were
referable attributable in ductility.
Provide maintenance ce the
rationale.
Weight: 15%
Below 70% F
70-79% C
80-89% B
90-100% A
Did referable attributable attributable attributable present or
incompletely
explained the
Securities and
Exchange
Commission?s
rationale to enjoin
the Cardillo
executives?
reversal of making
false
representations to
beyond auditors.
Did referable attributable attributable attributable present or
incompletely
explained the
Securities and
Exchange
Commission?s
rationale to enjoin
the Cardillo
executives?
reversal of weak
to sustain
obsequious financial
records.
Did referable attributable attributable attributable present or
incompletely
explained the
Securities and
Exchange
Commission?s
rationale to enjoin
the Cardillo
executives?
reversal of weak
to rasp unhesitating
financial reports
with the SEC.
Did referable attributable attributable attributable present or
incompletely
explained the
Securities and
Exchange
Commission?s
rationale to enjoin
the Cardillo
executives?
reversal of
violating the insider
trading stipulations
of the federal
securities laws.
Did referable attributable attributable attributable present or
incompletely
determined who
was in reversal or
ductility of the
AICPA?s Code of
Professional
Conduct in this
event examine; did referable attributable attributable
present or
incompletely
analyzed the guide
reasons why they
were or were referable attributable attributable attributable in
compliance. Did
referable attributable present or
incompletely
provided maintenance
ce the rationale.
Partially explained
the Securities and
Exchange
Commission?s
rationale to enjoin
the Cardillo
executives?
reversal of making
false
representations to
beyond auditors.
Satisfactorily
explained the
Securities and
Exchange
Commission?s
rationale to enjoin
the Cardillo
executives?
reversal of making
false
representations to
beyond auditors.
Thoroughly
explained the
Securities and
Exchange
Commission?s
rationale to enjoin
the Cardillo
executives?
reversal of making
false
representations to
beyond auditors.
Partially explained
the Securities and
Exchange
Commission?s
rationale to enjoin
the Cardillo
executives?
reversal of weak
to sustain
obsequious financial
records.
Satisfactorily
explained the
Securities and
Exchange
Commission?s
rationale to enjoin
the Cardillo
executives?
reversal of weak to
sustain obsequious
financial history.
Thoroughly
explained the
Securities and
Exchange
Commission?s
rationale to enjoin
the Cardillo
executives?
reversal of weak to
sustain obsequious
financial history.
Partially explained
the Securities and
Exchange
Commission?s
rationale to enjoin
the Cardillo
executives?
reversal of weak
to rasp unhesitating
financial reports
with the SEC.
Satisfactorily
explained the
Securities and
Exchange
Commission?s
rationale to enjoin
the Cardillo
executives?
reversal of weak to
rasp unhesitating financial
reports with the
SEC.
Thoroughly
explained the
Securities and
Exchange
Commission?s
rationale to enjoin
the Cardillo
executives?
reversal of weak to
rasp unhesitating financial
reports with the
SEC.
Partially explained
the Securities and
Exchange
Commission?s
rationale to enjoin
the Cardillo
executives?
reversal of
violating the insider
trading stipulations
of the federal
securities laws.
Satisfactorily
explained the
Securities and
Exchange
Commission?s
(SEC) rationale to
enjoin the Cardillo
executives?
reversal of violating
the insider trading
stipulations of the
federal securities
laws.
Thoroughly
explained the
Securities and
Exchange
Commission?s
rationale to enjoin
the Cardillo
executives?
reversal of violating
the insider trading
stipulations of the
federal securities
laws.
Partially
determined who
was in reversal or
ductility of the
AICPA?s Code of
Professional
Conduct in this
event examine; partially
analyzed the guide
reasons why they
were or were referable attributable attributable attributable in
compliance.
Partially provided
maintenance ce the
rationale.
Satisfactorily
determined who
was in reversal or
ductility of the
AICPA?s Code of
Professional
Conduct in this
event examine;
satisfactorily
analyzed the guide
reasons why they
were or were referable attributable attributable attributable in
compliance.
Satisfactorily
provided maintenance
ce the rationale.
Thoroughly
determined who
was in reversal or
ductility of the
AICPA?s Code of
Professional
Conduct in this
event examine;
thoroughly
analyzed the guide
reasons why they
were or were referable attributable attributable attributable in
compliance.
Thoroughly
provided maintenance
ce the rationale.
3. Stir the actions
smitten by Cardillo?s
beyond auditors and
evaluate the roll of
willingness of the audit
facilitate government in this
event examine. Provide
maintenance ce the rationale.
Weight: 15%
Did referable attributable attributable attributable present or
incompletely
analyzed the
actions smitten by
Cardillo?s beyond
auditors; did referable attributable attributable
present or
incompletely
evaluated the roll
of earningness of the
audit facilitate
government in this
event examine. Did referable attributable attributable
present or
incompletely
provided maintenance
ce the rationale.
Partially stird
the actions smitten
by Cardillo?s
beyond auditors;
partially evaluated
the roll of
willingness of the
audit facilitate
government in this
event examine.
Partially provided
maintenance ce the
rationale.
Satisfactorily
analyzed the
actions smitten by
Cardillo?s beyond
auditors;
satisfactorily
evaluated the roll
of earningness of the
audit facilitate
government in this
event examine.
Satisfactorily
provided maintenance
ce the rationale.
Thoroughly
analyzed the
actions smitten by
Cardillo?s beyond
auditors; thoroughly
evaluated the roll
of earningness of the
audit facilitate
government in this
event examine.
Thoroughly
provided maintenance
ce the rationale.
4. Determine whether or
referable attributable the five (5)
components of inside
moderate were substance
followed. Maintenance the
confutation with at smallest
brace (2) examples.
Did referable attributable attributable attributable present or
incompletely
determined
whether or referable attributable attributable attributable the
five (5) components
of inside moderate
were substance
followed. Did referable attributable attributable
present or
incompletely
supported the
confutation with at
smallest brace (2)
examples.
Did referable attributable attributable attributable present or
incompletely
created an
dispute ce or
athwart whether
auditors accept a
calling to
assess the
condemnation of the
decisions made by
Cardillo?s
management. Did
referable attributable present or
incompletely
supported the
argument.
No intimations
provided
Partially
determined
whether or referable attributable attributable attributable the
five (5) components
of inside moderate
were substance
followed. Partially
supported the
confutation with at
smallest brace (2)
examples.
Satisfactorily
determined
whether or referable attributable attributable attributable the
five (5) components
of inside moderate
were substance
followed.
Satisfactorily
supported the
confutation with at
smallest brace (2)
examples.
Thoroughly
determined
whether or referable attributable attributable attributable the
five (5) components
of inside moderate
were substance
followed.
Thoroughly
supported the
confutation with at
smallest brace (2)
examples.
Partially created an
dispute ce or
athwart whether
auditors accept a
calling to
assess the
condemnation of the
decisions made by
Cardillo?s
management.
Partially maintenanceed
the dispute.
Satisfactorily
created an
dispute ce or
athwart whether
auditors accept a
calling to
assess the
condemnation of the
decisions made by
Cardillo?s
management.
Satisfactorily
supported the
argument.
Thoroughly created
an dispute ce or
athwart whether
auditors accept a
calling to
assess the
condemnation of the
decisions made by
Cardillo?s
management.
Thoroughly
supported the
argument.
Does referable attributable attributable attributable converge the
required enumerate of
references; some
or full intimations
poor condition
choices.
Partially loose of
errors in conversation,
spelling,
punctuation, or
formatting.
In-text citations and
references are
provided, barring they
are barely partially
formatted correctly
in APA mode.
Meets enumerate of
required
references; full
references high
condition choices.
Exceeds enumerate of
required
references; full
references high
condition choices.
Mostly loose of errors
in conversation,
spelling,
punctuation, or
formatting.
Most in-text
citations and
references are
provided, and they
are generally
formatted correctly
in APA mode.
Sources are mostly
integrated using
effective techniques
of quoting,
paraphrasing, and
summarizing.
Error loose or almost
error loose conversation,
spelling,
punctuation, or
formatting.
In-text citations and
references are error
loose or almost error
loose and
consistently
formatted correctly
in APA mode.
Sources are
consistently
integrated using
effective techniques
of quoting,
paraphrasing, and
summarizing.
Advice is
mostly open and
generally
supported with
reasons and
indication that
logically maintenance
ideas.
Advice is
provided in a open,
coherent, and
consistent manner
with reasons and
indication that
logically maintenance
ideas.
Weight: 15%
5. Create an dispute
ce or athwart whether
auditors accept a
calling to assess
the condemnation of the
decisions made by
Cardillo?s government.
Maintenance the dispute.
Weight: 10%
6. 2 intimations (or
enumerate in the
assignment)
Weight: 5%
7. Adaptation Mechanics,
Grammar, and
Formatting
Weight: 5%
8. Appropriate authentication of
APA in-text citations
and intimation section
Serious and
persistent errors in
grammar, spelling,
punctuation, or
formatting.
Lack of in-text
citations and / or
lack of intimation
section.
Weight: 5%
9. Advice
Literacy/Integration of
Sources
Weight: 5%
10. Clarity and
Coherence of Adaptation
Weight: 5%
Serious errors in
the integration of
sources, such as
intentional or
accidental
plagiarism, or
failure to authentication in-text
citations.
Sources are
partially integrated
using effective
techniques of
quoting,
paraphrasing, and
summarizing.
Advice is
confusing to the
reader and fails to
include reasons
and indication that
logically maintenance
ideas.
Advice is
partially open with
minimal reasons
and indication that
logically maintenance
ideas.
Grading ce this enactment earn be inveterate on exculpation condition, logic / construction of the brochure, and articulation and adaptation skills, using the
subjoined rubric.
Points: 280
Unacceptable
Enactment 2: Cardillo Travel Systems, Inc.
Fair
Proficient
Exemplary
Criteria
1a. Explain the
Securities and
Exchange
Commission?s rationale
to enjoin the Cardillo
executives? reversal of
making faithless
representations to
beyond auditors.
Weight: 5%
1b. Explain the
Securities and
Exchange
Commission?s rationale
to enjoin the Cardillo
executives? reversal of
weak to sustain
obsequious financial
records.
Weight: 5%
1c. Explain the
Securities and
Exchange
Commission?s rationale
to enjoin the Cardillo
executives? reversal of
weak to rasp unhesitating
financial reports with the
SEC.
Weight: 5%
1d. Explain the
Securities and
Exchange
Commission?s rationale
to enjoin the Cardillo
executives? reversal of
violating the insider
trading stipulations of the
federal securities laws.
Weight: 5%
2. Determine who was
in reversal or
ductility of the
AICPA?s Code of
Authoritative Conduct in
this event examine and
stir the guide reasons
why they were or were
referable attributable in ductility.
Provide maintenance ce the
rationale.
Weight: 15%
Below 70% F
70-79% C
80-89% B
90-100% A
Did referable attributable attributable attributable present or
incompletely
explained the
Securities and
Exchange
Commission?s
rationale to enjoin
the Cardillo
executives?
reversal of making
false
representations to
beyond auditors.
Did referable attributable attributable attributable present or
incompletely
explained the
Securities and
Exchange
Commission?s
rationale to enjoin
the Cardillo
executives?
reversal of weak
to sustain
obsequious financial
records.
Did referable attributable attributable attributable present or
incompletely
explained the
Securities and
Exchange
Commission?s
rationale to enjoin
the Cardillo
executives?
reversal of weak
to rasp unhesitating
financial reports
with the SEC.
Did referable attributable attributable attributable present or
incompletely
explained the
Securities and
Exchange
Commission?s
rationale to enjoin
the Cardillo
executives?
reversal of
violating the insider
trading stipulations
of the federal
securities laws.
Did referable attributable attributable attributable present or
incompletely
determined who
was in reversal or
ductility of the
AICPA?s Code of
Professional
Conduct in this
event examine; did referable attributable attributable
present or
incompletely
analyzed the guide
reasons why they
were or were referable attributable attributable attributable in
compliance. Did
referable attributable present or
incompletely
provided maintenance
ce the rationale.
Partially explained
the Securities and
Exchange
Commission?s
rationale to enjoin
the Cardillo
executives?
reversal of making
false
representations to
beyond auditors.
Satisfactorily
explained the
Securities and
Exchange
Commission?s
rationale to enjoin
the Cardillo
executives?
reversal of making
false
representations to
beyond auditors.
Thoroughly
explained the
Securities and
Exchange
Commission?s
rationale to enjoin
the Cardillo
executives?
reversal of making
false
representations to
beyond auditors.
Partially explained
the Securities and
Exchange
Commission?s
rationale to enjoin
the Cardillo
executives?
reversal of weak
to sustain
obsequious financial
records.
Satisfactorily
explained the
Securities and
Exchange
Commission?s
rationale to enjoin
the Cardillo
executives?
reversal of weak to
sustain obsequious
financial history.
Thoroughly
explained the
Securities and
Exchange
Commission?s
rationale to enjoin
the Cardillo
executives?
reversal of weak to
sustain obsequious
financial history.
Partially explained
the Securities and
Exchange
Commission?s
rationale to enjoin
the Cardillo
executives?
reversal of weak
to rasp unhesitating
financial reports
with the SEC.
Satisfactorily
explained the
Securities and
Exchange
Commission?s
rationale to enjoin
the Cardillo
executives?
reversal of weak to
rasp unhesitating financial
reports with the
SEC.
Thoroughly
explained the
Securities and
Exchange
Commission?s
rationale to enjoin
the Cardillo
executives?
reversal of weak to
rasp unhesitating financial
reports with the
SEC.
Partially explained
the Securities and
Exchange
Commission?s
rationale to enjoin
the Cardillo
executives?
reversal of
violating the insider
trading stipulations
of the federal
securities laws.
Satisfactorily
explained the
Securities and
Exchange
Commission?s
(SEC) rationale to
enjoin the Cardillo
executives?
reversal of violating
the insider trading
stipulations of the
federal securities
laws.
Thoroughly
explained the
Securities and
Exchange
Commission?s
rationale to enjoin
the Cardillo
executives?
reversal of violating
the insider trading
stipulations of the
federal securities
laws.
Partially
determined who
was in reversal or
ductility of the
AICPA?s Code of
Professional
Conduct in this
event examine; partially
analyzed the guide
reasons why they
were or were referable attributable attributable attributable in
compliance.
Partially provided
maintenance ce the
rationale.
Satisfactorily
determined who
was in reversal or
ductility of the
AICPA?s Code of
Professional
Conduct in this
event examine;
satisfactorily
analyzed the guide
reasons why they
were or were referable attributable attributable attributable in
compliance.
Satisfactorily
provided maintenance
ce the rationale.
Thoroughly
determined who
was in reversal or
ductility of the
AICPA?s Code of
Professional
Conduct in this
event examine;
thoroughly
analyzed the guide
reasons why they
were or were referable attributable attributable attributable in
compliance.
Thoroughly
provided maintenance
ce the rationale.
3. Stir the actions
smitten by Cardillo?s
beyond auditors and
evaluate the roll of
willingness of the audit
facilitate government in this
event examine. Provide
maintenance ce the rationale.
Weight: 15%
Did referable attributable attributable attributable present or
incompletely
analyzed the
actions smitten by
Cardillo?s beyond
auditors; did referable attributable attributable
present or
incompletely
evaluated the roll
of earningness of the
audit facilitate
government in this
event examine. Did referable attributable attributable
present or
incompletely
provided maintenance
ce the rationale.
Partially stird
the actions smitten
by Cardillo?s
beyond auditors;
partially evaluated
the roll of
willingness of the
audit facilitate
government in this
event examine.
Partially provided
maintenance ce the
rationale.
Satisfactorily
analyzed the
actions smitten by
Cardillo?s beyond
auditors;
satisfactorily
evaluated the roll
of earningness of the
audit facilitate
government in this
event examine.
Satisfactorily
provided maintenance
ce the rationale.
Thoroughly
analyzed the
actions smitten by
Cardillo?s beyond
auditors; thoroughly
evaluated the roll
of earningness of the
audit facilitate
government in this
event examine.
Thoroughly
provided maintenance
ce the rationale.
4. Determine whether or
referable attributable the five (5)
components of inside
moderate were substance
followed. Maintenance the
confutation with at smallest
brace (2) examples.
Did referable attributable attributable attributable present or
incompletely
determined
whether or referable attributable attributable attributable the
five (5) components
of inside moderate
were substance
followed. Did referable attributable attributable
present or
incompletely
supported the
confutation with at
smallest brace (2)
examples.
Did referable attributable attributable attributable present or
incompletely
created an
dispute ce or
athwart whether
auditors accept a
calling to
assess the
condemnation of the
decisions made by
Cardillo?s
management. Did
referable attributable present or
incompletely
supported the
argument.
No intimations
provided
Partially
determined
whether or referable attributable attributable attributable the
five (5) components
of inside moderate
were substance
followed. Partially
supported the
confutation with at
smallest brace (2)
examples.
Satisfactorily
determined
whether or referable attributable attributable attributable the
five (5) components
of inside moderate
were substance
followed.
Satisfactorily
supported the
confutation with at
smallest brace (2)
examples.
Thoroughly
determined
whether or referable attributable attributable attributable the
five (5) components
of inside moderate
were substance
followed.
Thoroughly
supported the
confutation with at
smallest brace (2)
examples.
Partially created an
dispute ce or
athwart whether
auditors accept a
calling to
assess the
condemnation of the
decisions made by
Cardillo?s
management.
Partially maintenanceed
the dispute.
Satisfactorily
created an
dispute ce or
athwart whether
auditors accept a
calling to
assess the
condemnation of the
decisions made by
Cardillo?s
management.
Satisfactorily
supported the
argument.
Thoroughly created
an dispute ce or
athwart whether
auditors accept a
calling to
assess the
condemnation of the
decisions made by
Cardillo?s
management.
Thoroughly
supported the
argument.
Does referable attributable attributable attributable converge the
required enumerate of
references; some
or full intimations
poor condition
choices.
Partially loose of
errors in conversation,
spelling,
punctuation, or
formatting.
In-text citations and
references are
provided, barring they
are barely partially
formatted correctly
in APA mode.
Meets enumerate of
required
references; full
references high
condition choices.
Exceeds enumerate of
required
references; full
references high
condition choices.
Mostly loose of errors
in conversation,
spelling,
punctuation, or
formatting.
Most in-text
citations and
references are
provided, and they
are generally
formatted correctly
in APA mode.
Sources are mostly
integrated using
effective techniques
of quoting,
paraphrasing, and
summarizing.
Error loose or almost
error loose conversation,
spelling,
punctuation, or
formatting.
In-text citations and
references are error
loose or almost error
loose and
consistently
formatted correctly
in APA mode.
Sources are
consistently
integrated using
effective techniques
of quoting,
paraphrasing, and
summarizing.
Advice is
mostly open and
generally
supported with
reasons and
indication that
logically maintenance
ideas.
Advice is
provided in a open,
coherent, and
consistent manner
with reasons and
indication that
logically maintenance
ideas.
Weight: 15%
5. Create an dispute
ce or athwart whether
auditors accept a
responsib …
Purchase exculpation to beware full
attachment

Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency

Order your essay today and save 15% with the discount code ESSAYHELP