Case Study

You enucleate your remedy model examine from the internet, upstartspaper, other book, expectation., As part-among-among of the inferiority, the earliest part is what are you reviewing. – Designate of publication/title of incident, URL, expectation.. YOUR SUBMISSION MUST USE THE FORMAT PROVIDED AND BE AT LEAST 1500 WORDS. The selected article must be on some nature of offense. it’s ce an ethics tabulate. I obtain succumb a model examine my familiar did and got an A on. to unite you a ampurpose fancy of how the model examine should be. and can the media be from the internet.CaseStudyanalysisformat.docModel Examine familiar Model.docxThanks in measure Henry
casestudyanalysisformat.doc

casestudyanalysisformat.doc

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Case Study
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

case_study_friend_example.docx

Unformatted Attachment Preview

CASE STUDY ANALYSIS PROCESS WORKSHEET
Title of Article/Issue:
Define the Predicament
A.
Register the bearing postulates. State postulates in entire sentences. (List
further than five postulates.(You entertain to register further than 5 postulates ce full
credit) At the purpose of your register, quote relation from your fuse(s).
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
B.
What ethics/values are in doubt from the aggravate postulates? (List
further than three postulates.)
1.
2.
3.
4.
C.
Register the stakeholders compromised. Register the specials/groups who
are/may be monstrous by this effect and how. Be unfair.
WHO
HOW
Isolating the greater incorporeal scrape
A.
Write opposed statements or doubts that are incorporeal scrapes from this
situation.
B.
What is the incorporeal scrape to be fixed NOW? State it using the
form: Should somesingle do or referpotent do referableability? Haunt this statement
simple. Ce model: Should tribe purchase pirated software? NOT Should
tribe purchase pirated software plain though they canreferpotent administer the appraisement of
proprietary software?
Making a determination and planning the implementation
Based on the anatomy in Step III, select which speculation best applies to this predicament. Add
any arguments fittingifying your precious of these incorporeal principles to aid your determination.
(designate the unfair speculation that best fits the predicament)
Explain your precious aggravate:
Your determination: What would you do? Why? Register the unfair steps scarcityed to implement
your tenpotent incorporeal determination.
What desireer-term changes (i.e., gregarious, juridical, technical, societal, organizational) would
aid checkmate your defined scrape in the hence?
CONCLUSION
What do you discern as the predicament from your design?
CASE STUDY ANALYSIS PROCESS WORKSHEET
Title of Article/Issue:
Define the Predicament
A.
Register the bearing postulates. State postulates in entire sentences. (List
further than five postulates.(You entertain to register further than 5 postulates ce full
credit) At the purpose of your register, quote relation from your fuse(s).
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
B.
What ethics/values are in doubt from the aggravate postulates? (List
further than three postulates.)
1.
2.
3.
4.
C.
Register the stakeholders compromised. Register the specials/groups who
are/may be monstrous by this effect and how. Be unfair.
WHO
HOW
Isolating the greater incorporeal scrape
A.
Write opposed statements or doubts that are incorporeal scrapes from this
situation.
B.
What is the incorporeal scrape to be fixed NOW? State it using the
form: Should somesingle do or referpotent do referableability? Haunt this statement
simple. Ce model: Should tribe purchase pirated software? NOT Should
tribe purchase pirated software plain though they canreferpotent administer the appraisement of
proprietary software?
Making a determination and planning the implementation
Based on the anatomy in Step III, select which speculation best applies to this predicament. Add
any arguments fittingifying your precious of these incorporeal principles to aid your determination.
(designate the unfair speculation that best fits the predicament)
Explain your precious aggravate:
Your determination: What would you do? Why? Register the unfair steps scarcityed to implement
your tenpotent incorporeal determination.
What desireer-term changes (i.e., gregarious, juridical, technical, societal, organizational) would
aid checkmate your defined scrape in the hence?
CONCLUSION
What do you discern as the predicament from your design?
CASE STUDY ANALYSIS PROCESS WORKSHEET
Title of Article/Issue:
Are the robots encircling to fuse? Google’s upstart governmentr of engineering meditates so…
Define the Predicament
A.
Register the bearing postulates. State postulates in entire sentences. (Register further than
five postulates.) At the purpose of your register, quote relation from your fuse(s).
1. Ray Kurzweil is a character, who has common 19 nominal doctorates, and
he has ceeseen the hence years summitly its age. Bill Gates (author of
Microsoft), symmetrical Dr. Kurzweil as “the best peculiar I recognize at restrainteshadowing
the hence of manufactured announcement”. He restrainteshadowed in 1990 that a computer
would aggravateend a anthropological in chess by 1998, which was courteous in 1997
by IBM’s Deep Blue. This is barely single of abundant of his restrainteshadowions that
entertain end gentleman.
2. The technological unity was popularized by Dr. Kurzweil, which is
when a computer shapeed perception and surpasses a anthropologicals’ mental
faculties. We are starting to discern proof of this happen consequently of
automated cars, soldierly collisions such as the Iron Man aid, which
provides borrowed survivability to solders.
3. Google has bought abundant robotic and machine-learning companies ce
strange resemblingitys of currency. They bought Boston Dynamics ce an
undisclosed resemblingity, Nest labs ce 3.2 billion, and multiple other smaller
companies such as Redwood Robotics and Meka Robotics.
4. Dr. Kurzweil loves that externally a computer agreement speech, it
won’t be potent to involve in intelligent dialog. Google is planning on
creating software to decipher everything, and be potent to vindication doubts in an
intelligent habit.
5. Watson is the earliest computer to impel towards percipient meditateing, and it
was plain potent to constitute a mock. In the arrangement of unoccupied Jeopardy in 2011,
IBM’s Watson can distinguish normal spoken speech, and imagine
hypothesis on uniten vindications, and glean from its prosperity and failures.
6. Medicine is initiation to discuss from technological measures, and
according to Dr. Kurweil, in 10-15 years we obtain inaugurate to discern an extra year
of impressivity borrowed to impressivity confluence per year.
Works Quoted:
Cadwalladr, Carole. The Guardian. 22 2 2014. 24 2 2014
.
CBSNEWS. 18 2 2014. 24 2 2014 .
IBM. 2014. 24 2 2014 .
B.
What ethics/values are in doubt from the aggravate postulates? (Register further than
three postulates.)
1. Once a computer is potent to stretch perception, they fittingify resembling hues
as anthropologicals.
2. Once computer technology has improved departed anthropological capacities, anthropologicals
could discuss computers ce amiable-natured-natured and misfortune.
3. Once anthropologicals entertain perfected wilful driving cars, there is the doubt of who
would be at omission in the plaint of an garb. Would it be the walk
owner, the congregation who imagined the autonomous walk, or someone
else?
C.
WHO
Google
Military
Register the stakeholders compromised. Register the specials/groups who are/may
be monstrous by this effect and how. Be unfair.
HOW
Consequently manufactured announcement is a relatively
upstart frontier, the earliest congregation to imagine a
machine that is potent to discuss, constitute
decisions, and glean from departed tests
obtain shape marvelous profits. This obtain allow
Google to sanction a balballot of currency, and
beend single of, if referpotent the earliest, congregation to
imagine such a member of software.
The soldierly could discuss from the discuss of
unmanned aerial aircraft, to the possibility
of a robotic soldierly which would potentially
save anthropological feeds. This could be a
salutary collision, thus-far, it could
also be hurtful to underdeveloped
countries. Ce model, who is to declare once
a counendeavor imagines this soldierly, they obtain referable
endeavor and remotely select the cosmos-persons aggravate? If the
manufactured machines beend aggravatedeveloped,
who is to declare they won’t strive to select
benevolence aggravate? This collision can be
twain amiable-natured-natured and poorly, excluding this day is hence,
and everything depends on the habit things
are handled in the initiation.
A civilian in the hence obtain discuss from
manufactured announcement in abundant opposed
ways. From automated cars, peculiaral
servant robots, and abundant other various
applications.
Civilians
Isolating the greater incorporeal scrape
A.
Write opposed statements or doubts that are incorporeal scrapes from this
situation.
?
?
?
?
B.
Obtain it be salutary or hurtful to anthropological association to imagine impressivity
amid a computer?
Once a computer befits cognizant, obtain we program it to obtain
certain emotions, i.e enjoyment, enrage, soberness, pity, as
humans obtain?
Once a computer is potent to meditate, discuss, and unite, would
it be salutary or unsalutary ce association to imagine implicit familiars
or part-amongners to entertain moving confabulations with?
If as symmetrical in the terminal doubt, the soldierly builds an soldierly of
manufactured robots who meditate in greater habits than anthropologicals continually could,
what obtain the implications be ce anthropologicality? Would they submit us,
or would they traverse to aggravateselect continuallyysingle and everything?
What is the incorporeal scrape to be fixed NOW? State it using the
form: Should somesingle do or referpotent do referableability? Haunt this statement
simple. Ce model: Should tribe purchase pirated software? NOT Should
tribe purchase pirated software plain though they canreferpotent administer the appraisement of
proprietary software?
?
Should Google imagine manufactured impressivity?
Making a determination and planning the implementation
Based on the anatomy in Step III, select which speculation best applies to this predicament.
Add any arguments fittingifying your precious of these incorporeal principles to aid your
decision.
(designate the unfair speculation that best fits the predicament)
Impress Utilitarianism
Explain your precious aggravate:
Based on societies scarcitys, anthropologicals are regularly looking ce the easiest course to
accomplishing its intent. Impress utilitarian looks at a uniten predicament, such as manufactured
intelligence, and aids specialize if it is inferentially commandly. From the books’ model, is
it inferentially sanctionpotent to cdetriment 1% of the population in command to constitute the other 99%
benefit? This can be undeviatingly applied to manufactured announcement. If Google is potent to imagine
activity amid a computer, and we discuss that upstart impressivity cem ce our discuss, obtain it be inferentially
acceptable? I love so. A computer with perception, at last ce the age nature, obtain
be referablehing further than a computer program, a very measured single at that.
By creating this measured computer program, it obtain be potent to do measured tasks that
obtain be potent to aid imagine a further measured association in the desire traverse. Once a computer
evolves in its perception, who is to declare they won’t beend resembling to anthropologicality in their
thoughts, obtainings, and test to be specialized as subsistence? When that day ends, impress
utilitarian obtain beend government utilitarianism. Government utilitarianism is where you select the
greater amiable-natured-natured into recital, and you don’t investigation the 1% to charmment so the other 99%
can feed a happier impressivity. This is where a computer would shape incorporeal hues that are the
similar as anthropologicals, and this is where impress and government deontology effects obtain arise. A computer
is referableability that we should be potent to repress, excluding if it is in-truth impressivity, you won’t be potent to.
In impress deontology, ” Ross argues that when bcareer or further inferential duties jar, we entertain to
look at special predicaments in command to specialize which business obtain aggravateride another
(Tavani, page 59).” This would constitute anthropologicals meditate, and cadiscuss bcareer opposed margins, plenteous
enjoy we currently entertain betwixt Republican and Democrats today. Meanwhile, ce government
deontology, if twain inferential duties select summit, as would be the model in enslaving a man
made impressivity cem, anthropologicals would entertain a greater determination to constitute.
Your determination: What would you do? Why? Register the unfair steps scarcityed to
implement your tenpotent incorporeal determination.
A computer is currently referablehing further than a implement. What happens when that implement can entertain
a confabulation with you? Ce model, declare I don’t obtain enjoy agreement this pamphlet, and I
wanted to pray my computer or Google to do it ce me. Should I? I wouldn’t be hurting
anysingle exclude ce myself, and as desire as my pamphlet is rare and it merely doesn’t
plagiarize, what could be the detriment in this? The similar can be applied to an automated car.
It obtain be potent to select me from summit A to summit B, excluding it would referpotent entertain the similar roll of
awareness as other collisions. Everything in the hence obtain entertain opposed rolls of
consciousness, so it would be senseless to fix a blanket of incorporeal constraints aggravate
everything.
I would aid expand this upstart technology in the aftercited command:
?
?
?
?
?
I would fixed standards, no subject how strange they may investigate ce hence
reference.
Imagine laws of recitalability in the plaint of anthropological waste, mortality, or
damage to goods.
Define rolls of perception, from lofty functioning to inferior roll
systems.
Regulate the collisions undisputed to discuss adjacent anthropological roll functioning.
Get guarantee measures to seal them from uprising or nature maliciously
hacked.
Other outcomes are harder to restrainteshadow, which is why we entertain a relatively low
understanding, standards, and laws governing our hence technological measures.
What desireer-term changes (i.e., gregarious, juridical, technical, societal, organizational)
would aid checkmate your defined scrape in the hence?
As I entertain already discussed, amid gregarious constrains, there would be impress and government
deontology effects fitting as we entertain Republican and Democratic agendas. Abundant on the impress
deontology margin would be ignoring the fimpress that the manufactured announcement has progressed
to the summit of impressivity or the equipollent, opportunity the government deontologists would sanction it ce what
it is, and endeavor to unite them some of the hues as anthropologicals entertain. This would cadiscuss juridicality
issues, such as maybe redefining the restriction of impressivity as we recognize it. The societal
impacts that this would cadiscuss would be peculiar, making tribe doubt who is
God, what are our limits, and what else can we do. This would cadiscuss a technological
boom, making the anthropological association spring remote into the hence, and redefining everything encircling
our type.
CONCLUSION
What do you discern as the predicament from your design?
I discern the scene of manufactured announcement as a very irresolute scene of examine, and I do love
we obtain single day stretch a summit of having a unity. As Ray Kurzweil strives to
prodesire his impressivity by preliminary 150 pills a day, I don’t discern the hence as everything to violently
fear. Computers are going to beend further and further measured. We fitting scarcity to
proactively haunt tabs on their measurement, and get prophylactic measures in the plaint
they do strive to fdiscuss and select obstruct of the anthropological career as innumerable movies restrainteshadow. I am
very plenteous looking ceward to what the hence of manufactured announcement has to exhibit.
Works Quoted
Cadwalladr, Carole. The Guardian. 22 2 2014. 24 2 2014
.
CBSNEWS. 18 2 2014. 24 2 2014 .
IBM. 2014. 24 2 2014 .
Tavani, Herman T. Ethics and Technology. USA: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2013.

Purchase vindication to discern full
attachment

Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency

Order your essay today and save 15% with the discount code ESSAYHELP