Discussion reflections should include answers to the following : Summarize either the “yes” or “no” side for one of the articles discussed this week. State why the argument is strong or weak.Make sur

Discussion reflections should understand answers to the cethcoming : Summarize either the “yes” or “no” verge ce single of the creed discussed this week. State why the evidence is cogent or wishy-washy.Make safe to cite express quotes or summaries with page bulk to exhibition how this evidence works or doesn’t and notice which intellectual hypothesis you admire the writer is using to defend their right.gladden interpretation the cethcoming references:https://www.utm.edu/staff/jfieser/class/160/3-drugs.htm – Feiser, J. (2017). “Drugs” from Moral Issues that Divide Us. University of Tennessee, Martin (UTM) (Website)Szasz, T. (1992). “The Fatal Temptation: Drug Prohibition and the Fear of Autonomy .” Daedalus, 121(3), 161-164 (PDF)Levine, C. (2008). “Do banner medical ethics allot in distress provisions? ” Ed. In Taking Verges: Clashing Views on Biomedical Issues. McGraw Hill: Dubuque, IA. (PDF)Murray, T. (2008). “Doping in sport: challenges ce therapeutics, skill and ethics. ” Journal of Internal Therapeutics, 264(2), 95–98. (PDF)”Gene Therapy and Genetic Engineering.” (n.d.). (Website)- https://medicine.missouri.edu/centers-institutes-labs/health-ethics/faq/gene-therapy