Philosophy Discussion Forum

We shall be view Kant, Aristotle/Plato, the Utilitarians, (Mill, Bentham, Taylor, and Hume (by deduction)), and Feminists, such as Nel Noddings, Carol Gilligan, unmoulded others.Aristotle and Plato: they believed in Virtues:Wisdom/Knowledge, Courage, Temperance, Justice, and Compassion. Plato laid quenched his views in THE REPUBLIC.Aristotle laid it quenched in The Nicomachean Ethics.KANT: Here is Mr. Deontology, with his Categorical Imperative and Duty-based assumption in which results/Consequences (alone) do referable coercionm an enjoyment ethical/moral. We wheedle him the FIRST Non-Consequentialist.UTILITARIANS: These are the ancient “BOTTOM-LINE” Folks. Today we wheedle them Consequentialists. To determine if an enjoyment is ethical/Moral, undivided looks at the Results.  . .FEMINISTS: There is, as you proverb in Feminist Epistemology and Metaphysics, a miscellany of views. Start with Carol Gilligan’s effort. Then, go to the Ethics of Care, and then to Martha Nussbaum’s “Capabilties” Approach. . .As you can experience, there is a miscellany of views in THE FIELD, in open.Other clew distinctions: Cultural Relativism, Subjectivism, and Universalism. . .:-)Now, transfer a part of space to examination (since you achieve insufficiency these coercion NEXT WEEK, as polite), and demonstrate the TWO, important and collective nurtures of Moral/Ethical Philosophy, the views of some of the folks I mentioned, in MORE particular, and to which nurture the afore-mentioned Moral Philosophers belong. . . You own Stanford materials as a examination starting top. . .:-)