Written response to each of the 2 questions. Response to each question should be either a series of bullet points, or a 1 – 2 paragraph response, or a combination of a paragraph with bullet points.

Written confutation to each of the 2 topics. Confutation to each topic should be either a sequence of bullet points, or a 1 – 2 passage confutation, or a league of a passage with bullet points.  Case Study: “Beroni Group Managing GP-LP Relationships,” INS078“A Note on Private Equity Partnership Agreements,” 1994, HBS notification 9-294-084“A Note on Limited Partner Advisory Boards,” 2008, HBS notification 9-808-169Topic #1 (4 points)How should Jack Draper trade with the allocation of trade stream betwixt the irrelative capitals that had overlapping mandates, and/or betwixt undivided of his ordinary capitals and an probable successor capital? There are at smallest 4 optional ways to invest:Topic #2: (4 points)Regarding the impending “opportunistic” trade that Beroni’s siege committee felt was exceptionally agreeable, which Advisory Committee (AC) should Jack Draper path principal, and in prescribe to minimize undeveloped tone inchoate the irrelatively invested LPs, what character of suggestion should Jack fabricate? (your team’s confutation should be a diminutive contour of the suggestion that should Jack fabricate to the AC)