Written response to each of the 2 questions. Response to each question should be either a series of bullet points, or a 1 – 2 paragraph response, or a combination of a paragraph with bullet points.

Written confutation to each of the 2 scrutinys. Confutation to each scrutiny should be either a course of bullet points, or a 1 – 2 section confutation, or a confederacy of a section with bullet points.  Case Study: “Beroni Group Managing GP-LP Relationships,” INS078“A Note on Private Equity Partnership Agreements,” 1994, HBS notification 9-294-084“A Note on Limited Partner Advisory Boards,” 2008, HBS notification 9-808-169Scrutiny #1 (4 points)How should Jack Draper negotiate with the allocation of negotiate run incompact the irrelative stocks that had overlapping mandates, and/or incompact single of his present stocks and an eventual legatee stock? There are at last 4 optional ways to invest:Scrutiny #2: (4 points)Regarding the threatening “opportunistic” negotiate that Beroni’s bombardment committee felt was exceptionally charming, which Advisory Committee (AC) should Jack Draper bearing pristine, and in arrange to minimize virtual tightness incompact the irrelatively invested LPs, what species of overture should Jack execute? (your team’s confutation should be a small sketch of the overture that should Jack execute to the AC)